Jump to content
This is a snapshot of the forum as it was on Thursday 2nd Dec 2021. Not everything will work.
It is not possible to login, edit or make any changes and is provided for prosterity for those who wish to view the old content.
C.A.M.F.C - Members & Visitors area

Relative attack angles of wing and tailplane


Recommended Posts

  • Club Members

Hi,

Does anyone know the answer to this? I am building a CAP232 from scratch (don't ask why, it's just one of those things I have to get out of my system). Something I have never really thought about before, should the angle of attack of the tailplane be parallel to that of the wing or should it be tilted slightly up (to give the tail some extra lift) or down (for whatever reason)? If the angles are different, by how much?

 

Wingspan: 57"

Fuse length: 48"

 

Happy Easter

Edited by Guest
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 9 years later...

 

Hi,

Does anyone know the answer to this? I am building a CAP232 from scratch (don't ask why, it's just one of those things I have to get out of my system). Something I have never really thought about before, should the angle of attack of the tailplane be parallel to that of the wing or should it be tilted slightly up (to give the tail some extra lift) or down (for whatever reason)? If the angles are different, by how much?

 

Wingspan: 57"

Fuse length: 48"

 

Happy Easter

 

Hey there Trevor,

 

If you are going to change the angle at all, then I suggest having the frontmost part of the plane tipping down, so that the back of the tail is raised slightly. Don't overdo it, though! A couple of degrees is more than enough. Angling the tail in this way can let you get away with a slightly underpowered power system, but it may cause the nose to pitch up if you punch the throttle.

 

It will also fly great with no angle at all.

 

Hope this helps!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Club Members

 

Quite a few modern aerobatic models have both at the same angle (i.e. zero decalage), but David A. Scott's book "Airplane and Radio Setup" goes into quite a lot of detail about why he thinks this is a bad idea, and recommends setting the wing at 0.5 degrees of additional incidence relative to the tailplane - i.e. the tail is in line with the anticipated direction of travel, and the wing is angled upwards an additional 0.5 degrees. (This recommendation is for neutral stability with a symmetrical airfoil.)

 

His argument is that zero decalage with a symmetric airfoil requires the use of additional up elevator trim to maintain the angle of attack of the wing. While this does work, this has a different effect depending on the airspeed, and so the aircraft will tend to pitch up at higher airspeeds.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Club Members

No, I hadn't noticed that! The thread popped up in my "unread posts" due to the new reply. I did think it was odd that Trevor's reply appeared above the other reply, but I hadn't realised why...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.